When President Obama won the presidency in 2008, he vowed to bring real change in America. He has kept his word to carry out “Change you can believe in.” That change, however, is not what most Americans perceived. The actual direction of change has not been to rid Washington of corruption, as promised, but rather to change America from a free enterprise-based economy to a partner of the international socialist community to “spread the wealth around.” The evidence is in statements by men and women appointed by President Obama to carry out “Change.” Consider the following:

Department of Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta recently admitted to Congress that the decision whether to send US troops into Syria will be made by NATO or the UN, rather than the U.S. Congress (as stipulated by the US Constitution);

Department of Energy Secretary Dr. Stephen Chu stated that American taxpayers should be required to pay fuel prices equal with European motorists in order to be “fair” to the international community;

Department of Education Secretary Arne Duncan is pushing USA schools to adopt the international core curriculum that emphasizes values and content common in European, Asian, and Middle East nations so that US students ostensibly can compete in the world economy (even though many international academic standards are adversarial to traditional American values and beliefs);

 

Department of State Secretary Hillary R. Clinton is of the opinion that US foreign policy should be determined by consensus from the international community, rather than by Congressional leaders and US Constitutional stipulations.

Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius contends that the US government has the right to set aside personal religious beliefs that are considered inconsistent with policies on human reproduction established by the US Department of Health and Human Services and the international community;

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet A. Napolitano and Deputy Director Kumar Kibble believe that protection of US borders by US military troops would offend the international community. (The frightening fact is that under UN treaties signed in the 1960’s, International law stipulates that the southern US border would be patrolled by Chinese troops in the event of a major regional crisis. China has the world’s largest standing army, six times larger than US forces);

Acting Director of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Dan Heggem contends that the US should not drill for oil in US territory, and thereby increase the international supply of gasoline, because other oil-producing nations would be put to an unfair disadvantage; even though the EPA has encouraged other nations to drill off US shores to tap into the huge petroleum reserves outside the 12 mile international limit;

Department of the Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke are escalating the US debt (primarily to China, which is now the wealthiest nation on earth) in order to create a more balanced and fair distribution of wealth in the international community.

The elections this year are critical to the survival of America, lest our children grow up in bondage to socialism!

Respectfully,

Ronald E. Johnson

Zephyr, Texas